Barney frank dating fannie mae
Neutrality requires that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each....Keep in mind that, in determining proper weight, we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors.As for the Op Ed, you know we don't use those for sources, and it serves even less of a point as an external link.Tarc (talk) , 15 September 2009 (UTC) Please refactor your offensive question. We're here to discuss content and to focus on improving articles, not to be pointy and nasty.
How many report on his activity since being in congress?WP: OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not grounds for violating WP: UNDUE.Michael LNorth (talk) , 8 September 2009 (UTC) As to Co M's specific comment, I think the two sentences (re Giuliani and Frank) are comparable. Frank's has the detail of the length of the father's prison term, while Giuliani's says merely "served time", but both present the fact of the imprisonment and the crime.What's the argument for making the early life section long enough to warrant a significant amount of information about his dad's criminal activity?Michael LNorth (talk) , 8 September 2009 (UTC)By way of comparison, I note that Rudy Giuliani#Early life and education has precisely one sentence about Giuliani's father's criminal career.